by Trainset Mon Aug 17, 2020 6:33 pm
Fair play for the response. Many don't seem to give a toss about the scale of losses and I suppose this is understandable at present....like worrying about the hangover during a drinking session. Ignorance is indeed bliss but in behaving like this the long term patrons of the club are failing in their role of asking questions that need asking for the good of the club long after the Weavers. The amount of losses would send any club of our size under, not to mention any obligation to repay strata.
The statement is certainly unusual, why make it if the long term is fine? And for me it has worrying warning signs....let's hope the recession doesn't impact for folks desire to buy pricey new builds eh.
I think a reread of that final paragraph bears this out.
It would be an invaluable question to hold the owners to in terms of writing off any of the +£5m debt that has been accrued on stratas books over the years. Simple question with a huge answer.
Leaving the club 'in a better state' is hugely subjective, particularly in the context of how the club is positioned as a sub co, the debt built up and the tone of the statement in their annual accounts.
Wonder if anyone has big enough balls to ask this question??
Will the debt be written off when they leave?
Simples